Daf 129 — Chullin 129 Summary

Chullin 129 – Good Morning Raboisai Flesh Cut From Eiver Min HaChai When Does the Flesh Become Tamei? The Gemara continues with flesh cut from a limb that had come from a living animal. There are two possibilities: • If the flesh was cut first and only afterwards designated as food, it is tahor. • If it was first designated as food and then cut, it becomes tamei with Tum’as Ochlin. Why? Because before being cut: • The flesh was touching the Eiver Min HaChai, which is an Av HaTumah. Once it already had the status of food: • That contact can give it Tum’as Ochlin. Tum’as Beis HaSetarim But the Contact Was Hidden! The Gemara asks a major question. When two pieces are joined and then cut apart: • The actual point where they were touching was hidden inside. This is called: • Beis HaSetarim – a concealed area of contact. Normally: • Tumah through hidden contact does not transmit Tumah. So how did the flesh become tamei from the Eiver Min HaChai? Rebbe Meir and Hidden Contact Rebbe Zeira relates that he had this question and asked Rebbe Abba Mamal. The answer: • The Mishnah can follow Rebbe Meir. Rebbe Meir holds in certain circumstances: • Tum’as Beis HaSetarim can transmit Tumah. However, the Gemara qualifies this: • Where the food still requires Hechsher, the issue is more complicated. The Case Where It Already Had Hechsher The Gemara therefore establishes the case where: • The flesh had already received Hechsher • And was already susceptible to Tumah. Now the concealed contact with the Eiver Min HaChai: • Can make it tamei according to Rebbe Meir. Tumah Chamurah Why Should Hechsher Be Necessary? Rabbah bar Rav Chana asks: Why should we need Hechsher at all? Eiver Min HaChai has: • Tumah Chamurah – severe Tumah. What Is Tumah Chamurah? Here it means Tumah capable of making: • A person • Or keilim tamei. This is the level of: • Av HaTumah. By contrast, ordinary Tum’as Ochlin: • Cannot make a person or keilim tamei. Normally, something associated with Tumah Chamurah: • Does not require the ordinary Hechsher process. Panim Chadashos Ba’u L’Kan “When It Served the Dead, It Was Wood” The Gemara answers with an important principle: • K’sheshi'meish ma’aseh eitz shimeish. When this object previously served in its original role: • It was not functioning as food. Only afterwards: • Its designation changed • And it became food. Rashi summarizes the idea: • Panim Chadashos ba’u l’kan. It now has a new halachic identity. Therefore: • Its previous exposure to Tumah Chamurah does not automatically give its newly created food - status the same Tumah. Several Examples of the Same Principle Food Designated as a Seat Abaye gives an example. Someone has: • A large piece of food and permanently designates it: • For sitting. A Zav then sits on it. Normally, food cannot reach: • Tum’as Midras. But here it can. Why? Because once designated as a seat: • It is no longer functioning as food. • It is functioning as an object or chair. So this is not proof that ordinary food can receive Tumah Chamurah. It is: • Panim Chadashos ba’u l’kan. Food Used for Avodah Zarah Another example is: • Food which becomes part of Avodah Zarah. Avodah Zarah can have an extremely severe Tumah, including: • Tum’as Ohel according to the relevant opinion. Does this prove food can receive Tumah Chamurah? No. Once it functions as: • Avodah Zarah its previous food identity is no longer controlling. Again: • K’sheshi'meish ma’aseh eitz shimeish. Dough Used to Repair a Kli Another example: • Dough is used to plug a hole in a vessel. Once it becomes part of the kli: • It takes on the status of the vessel. If that vessel receives severe Tumah: • The dough can share its status. But again: • It is no longer functioning as food. • It is functioning as part of the kli. Fat Protecting a Kidney The Gemara discusses: • Fat surrounding a kidney. The fat can function as: • A shomer – protection for the kidney. Although it could potentially be food: • While functioning as a shomer it has a different halachic role. Only later, if designated as food: • It receives its new identity. Again: • Panim Chadashos ba’u l’kan. Grain Used as a Roof Rav Masna gives another example. If grain or similar produce is designated: • As roofing material it is no longer functioning as food. If the house subsequently receives: • Tum’as Tzaraas the roofing can participate in that severe Tumah. This does not prove ordinary food can become an Av HaTumah. Why? Because as part of the roof: • It is functioning as building material. The Common Principle All these cases teach the same point: An object may begin as: • Food but then acquire a completely different halachic identity. Its later status is judged according to: • What it is functioning as now. Rebbe Shimon Says Tahor Which Part of the Mishnah Is He Discussing? The Mishnah ended: • Rebbe Shimon metaher – Rebbe Shimon says it is tahor. The Gemara now asks: Exactly which case is Rebbe Shimon referring to? Several possibilities are considered. Possibility 1 – The Beginning of the Mishnah A Dangling Limb Touched by a Sheretz Perhaps Rebbe Shimon refers to: • A limb dangling from a living animal • Which was touched by a sheretz. The Tanna Kamma says: • It can receive Tum’as Ochlin. Perhaps Rebbe Shimon says: • Tahor. Why? Because to be food it must be: • Something permitted for consumption by someone. But this dangling limb: • Cannot yet be eaten even by a non - Jew because of Eiver Min HaChai. Therefore: • It lacks the necessary food status. But Why Need a Special Reason? The Gemara challenges this. Perhaps the reason it is tahor is much simpler: • It is still attached to the animal. We have already seen by a damaged branch: • If it remains sufficiently connected to survive, it is still considered attached. So perhaps no special rule about: • Edibility is needed. The Gemara therefore considers another part of the Mishnah. Possibility 2 – After Shechita The Shechita Blood Perhaps Rebbe Shimon refers to the middle case: • The animal was shechted • While the limb remained dangling. The Tanna Kamma says: • The Shechita blood provides Hechsher. Rebbe Shimon says: • Tahor. Again, perhaps because: • The dangling limb cannot be eaten. But Yesterday We Had Other Explanations The Gemara rejects this as necessary. Yesterday we learned several explanations for: • Rebbe Meir and Rebbe Shimon's disagreement. For example: • Whether such a weak connection counts • Whether the large animal can serve as a Yad for the small limb • Whether Yad works for Hechsher • And when Shechita takes effect. Therefore: • We do not need to say Rebbe Shimon's reason here is the edibility requirement. Possibility 3 – The End of the Mishnah The Animal Dies The Gemara therefore returns to the end of the Mishnah. The animal: • Dies while the limb or flesh is still dangling. We have learned the principle: • Misah osah nefilah. Death itself creates: • Halachic separation. But this produces an obvious problem. A Limb Is Tamei Either Way If we are discussing a complete limb: If it is viewed as separating immediately before death: • It is Eiver Min HaChai. If it remains attached until after death: • It is Eiver Min HaNeveilah. Either way: • It has Tumah. So how can Rebbe Shimon simply say: • Tahor? The Answer – We Are Discussing Flesh Basar Is Different From an Eiver The Gemara answers: Rebbe Shimon is not discussing: • A complete limb. He is discussing: • Basar – flesh. This makes a major difference. Ordinary flesh removed from a living animal: • Does not have Tum’as Eiver Min HaChai. Therefore, if: • Misah osah nefilah and the flesh is viewed as separating just before death: • It separated while the animal was alive. It is therefore: • Basar Min HaChai • Not Basar Min HaNeveilah. That explains why Rebbe Shimon can say: • Tahor. It Still Needs Hechsher Since this flesh is not itself carrying Tumah Chamurah: • It needs ordinary Hechsher before it can receive Tum’as Ochlin. This explains the Mishnah’s distinction between: • A dangling Eiver • And dangling Basar. A Dangling Limb of a Person The Mishnah Discusses a Human Being The Gemara brings a similar Mishnah regarding: • A dangling limb or flesh of a person. While the person is alive: • The dangling flesh is tahor. If the person dies: • The flesh remains subject to the discussion of whether death creates separation. A complete limb is different because: • Eiver Min HaChai of a person itself has Tumah. Misah Osah Nefilah by a Person Again we apply: • Misah osah nefilah. The limb is viewed as: • Halachically separating immediately before death. Therefore it can retain the status of: • Eiver Min HaChai rather than becoming simply: • Eiver Min HaMeis. A Tiny Complete Limb Less Than a Kezayis The Gemara now discusses a very important case: • A complete human limb • Containing less than a kezayis of flesh. Ordinarily: • Flesh from a meis requires a kezayis for Tumah. But a complete limb can have: • Its own independent significance. The question is whether this applies equally to: • Eiver Min HaChai • And Eiver Min HaMeis. Rebbe Eliezer’s Tradition Rebbe Eliezer says: • I heard that Eiver Min HaChai is tamei. A possible implication is: • Eiver Min HaMeis is not included in that particular teaching. The Gemara challenges this strongly. The Kal Vachomer If a limb from: • A living person can transmit Tumah even when it is very small, then surely a limb from: • A dead person should transmit Tumah. After all: • The dead body itself has the more severe Tumah. So logically: • Eiver Min HaMeis should certainly be tamei. The Pesach Sheni Comparison Can We Infer the Opposite? A comparison is brought from: • Pesach Sheni. If a source teaches that: • A hesped should not be made on Pesach Sheni we would not infer: • That it is permitted on Pesach Rishon. Quite the opposite: • If it is prohibited on Pesach Sheni • Certainly it is prohibited on the greater Yom Tov of Pesach Rishon. Likewise here: If Eiver Min HaChai is tamei: • Certainly we might expect Eiver Min HaMeis to be tamei. “Kach Shamati” After hearing the argument, Rebbe Eliezer responds simply: • Kach shamati – this is what I received. In other words: • This was not his own logical derivation. • It was a received tradition from his Rebbe. The Gemara highlights an important principle: • A clear mesorah is not overturned merely because we have a seemingly powerful logical argument. Kezayis Basar and Etzem K’Se’orah The Practical Difference The Gemara discusses the different components that can create Tumah: • Kezayis Basar – an olive - sized amount of flesh • Etzem k’se’orah – a bone the size of a barley grain. These can produce different results depending on whether they came from: • A living person • Or a dead person. This allows the Gemara to explain the machlokes without forcing Rebbe Shimon to be discussing: • An ordinary Eiver Min HaMeis. Rebbe Shimon’s Position The Gemara ultimately understands the dispute through: • The different Tumah rules of Basar and Eiver • And the different shiurim of flesh and bone. The key point remains: • A complete limb has a special halachic status • Which is not identical to ordinary flesh. Hadran Alach HaOr VeHaRotev Completing the Perek With this discussion, the Gemara completes the Perek: Hadran Alach HaOr VeHaRotev. The Perek has taken us through the detailed laws of: • Tum’as Ochlin • Yad and Shomer • Neveilah • Eiver Min HaChai • Attached and detached flesh • Maga, Masa and Ohel • And the different levels of Tumah. Key Chazarah • Flesh designated as food before being cut from Eiver Min HaChai can receive Tum’as Ochlin from the limb. • The Gemara questions this because the contact occurs in a Beis HaSetarim – a hidden area. • According to Rebbe Meir, hidden contact can transmit Tumah in the relevant circumstances. • Tumah Chamurah means Tumah capable of making Adam or keilim tamei. • “Panim Chadashos ba’u l’kan” means an object can acquire a new halachic identity when its function changes. • The Gemara applies this to food used as a seat, Avodah Zarah, dough repairing a kli, fat protecting a kidney and grain used as roofing. • Rebbe Shimon’s statement of tahor is ultimately explained through the distinction between a complete Eiver and ordinary Basar. • Misah osah nefilah means death creates the halachic separation of a dangling limb or flesh. • Basar Min HaChai does not have the same Tumah as Eiver Min HaChai. • A complete human limb can have special Tumah even when it contains less than a kezayis of flesh. • The Gemara discusses whether the same rule applies to Eiver Min HaChai and Eiver Min HaMeis. • Rebbe Eliezer responds to the logical challenge with “Kach shamati” – this is the tradition he received. • Kezayis Basar and Etzem k’se’orah have different Tumah rules and help define the final machlokes. • Hadran Alach HaOr VeHaRotev. Catch up, review, download previous Dafim & more: https://www.dafchazarah.co.uk Now available as an app (Apple, Google & Amazon): https://dafchazarah.co.uk/download Sponsor a day: https://dafchazarah.co.uk/sponsor לעילוי נשמת אמי מורתי רות בת הרב מנחם מנדל