Daf 124 — Chullin 124 Summary

Chullin 124 – Good Morning Raboisai Tearing a Tamei Garment Rav Bar Avuha – Tearing Is Not Always Enough The Gemara continues yesterday’s discussion of a tamei garment. Normally, destroying a kli removes: • Its status as a kli • And therefore its Tumah. Rav Bar Avuha teaches that simply beginning to tear the garment is not necessarily enough. If the garment was first: • Immersed in a mikvah And he then proceeds to tear it properly: • We can rely on the tearing. Otherwise there is concern: • He may stop before completing the amount necessary to destroy its status as a garment. A Partially Removed Hide Sheretz vs Other Animals Rebbe Dostai ben Yehudah quotes Rebbe Shimon: If someone removes the hide of a sheretz: • Even if most of the hide has already been removed • As long as some remains attached It can still be considered: • A chibur – connected to the sheretz. The Gemara initially infers: • By a sheretz it remains connected • But by an ordinary animal it would not. Hide Remaining on the Neck The Gemara explains the Beraisa differently. The comparison is specifically to: • A hide removed using the margil method • Where virtually the entire hide has been removed • And only the neck remains attached. Rebbe Yochanan ben Nuri holds: • At this stage it is no longer considered connected. Why Is There No Gezeirah? When only the neck remains attached: • The situation is obvious. Therefore: • We are not concerned that someone will mistakenly stop too early. Can Torn Leather “Heal”? Reish Lakish – Leather Is Different Reish Lakish introduces an important principle. There is a difference between: • Cloth • Leather. With cloth: • Once sufficiently torn, its previous status is destroyed. But leather can be different. If leather is cut while: • The bottom remains connected The two sides can still: • Be joined together effectively. It has a strong base and can be: • Sewn back together. Reish Lakish therefore treats the remaining connection as significant. Rebbe Yochanan Disagrees Rebbe Yochanan says: • Leather is no different from cloth. He does not accept: • Reish Lakish’s concept that the remaining connection makes it as though the leather is still joined. This becomes: • The central machlokes of the sugya. Cutting Leather for Straps or Sandals A Tamei Piece of Leather The Gemara discusses: • A piece of leather that is tamei through Midras. The owner decides to use it for: • Straps • Or sandals. He begins cutting it into: • Smaller pieces. Once the pieces no longer have the required size for Midras: • They become tahor. A Challenge to Reish Lakish According to Reish Lakish: If the pieces remain connected at the bottom: • They should still be considered joined. So why does cutting them: • Remove their Tumah? Answer The Gemara establishes the case where: • The leather is being cut in a curved or circular fashion. Such pieces: • Cannot easily be stitched back together into the original hide. Therefore: • Even Reish Lakish agrees that the original connection has been destroyed. Why Doesn't a Partially Removed Hide Remain Connected? Another Challenge The Mishnah taught that when skinning an animal for a flat hide: • Only kedei achizah – the amount needed to grip – remains connected for Tumah. Once more is removed: • The detached section is tahor. But according to Reish Lakish: • Some hide is still attached to the animal. Why shouldn't that connection: • Keep the entire hide joined? Rishon Rishon Naaseh Niprad Rebbe Avin answers: As the hide is removed: • Each section becomes detached immediately. Once hide has been separated from the flesh: • It cannot “heal” back onto the animal. Important Distinction Reish Lakish's principle applies where: • Two portions of leather remain connected to each other. It does not mean: • Detached hide can reconnect itself to the animal's flesh. The Hide Remaining Around the Neck Rebbe Yochanan ben Nuri The Gemara again challenges Reish Lakish: If almost the entire hide has been removed but: • It remains attached around the neck Rebbe Yochanan ben Nuri says: • It is not considered a chibur. Why doesn't the neck connection: • Join the entire hide? Yad or Shomer? The Gemara explains that this is a different issue. The remaining skin around the neck acts as: • A shomer – protection for the flesh. The question is: If the person intends shortly to remove that remaining skin: • Does it still qualify as a shomer? Therefore, this machlokes is not proof regarding: • Reish Lakish’s principle of connected leather. A Tamei Earthenware Oven How Do You Remove Its Tumah? The Gemara now turns to: • A tamei earthenware oven. To destroy its status as a kli: • It must be broken apart. One opinion requires: • Dividing it into three pieces • And removing the outer layer down to the ground. Why Three Pieces? If something is divided into three: • No single piece necessarily contains the majority of the original oven. This clearly destroys: • Its status as the original kli. Rebbe Meir Rebbe Meir gives a different shiur. The remaining pieces must be: • Less than four tefachim. According to this view: • It is not always necessary to remove the outer coating. The key question is: • Whether enough of the original oven remains to retain its status. The Outer Coating Reconnects the Oven A Challenge to Reish Lakish An oven consists of: • The inner earthenware structure • An outer coating surrounding it. Even after breaking the inner oven: • The outer coating may continue holding the pieces together. According to Reish Lakish: • Shouldn't that connection unify the pieces? If so: • Why should breaking the inner oven remove its Tumah? Removing the Outer Layer The Gemara answers that according to Reish Lakish: If the oven is already tamei: • The outer coating must also be removed. Otherwise: • It continues joining the pieces • And the oven retains its status. Prevention Is Different There is a separate question when: • The oven has not yet become tamei • And the owner merely wants to prevent it from becoming susceptible to Tumah. In that situation: • The Tannaim disagree whether breaking it sufficiently is enough • Without removing the outer coating. Four Tefachim or Three Pieces? The Shiur of a Large Oven The Gemara asks: A Beraisa teaches that a large oven initially requires: • Four tefachim To receive Tumah. After becoming tamei: • A sufficiently large remaining piece can retain its Tumah. How does this fit with the requirement to: • Divide the oven into three pieces? Horizontal vs Vertical Cuts The Gemara distinguishes between: • Cutting the oven horizontally • Cutting it vertically. A horizontal break: • Makes it difficult for the oven to stand and function properly. A vertical section: • Can potentially remain standing and usable. Therefore: • Different amounts may be required to destroy its status • Depending on how it was broken. A Small Oven How Small Can an Oven Be? The Gemara discusses: • A very small oven. A small oven can initially become susceptible to Tumah at: • A much smaller size. The Gemara questions: What practical use could there be for: • A tiny fragment of such an oven? Abaye therefore explains: • The discussion of a majority refers to a larger oven • Not an unusably tiny fragment. Majority vs Four Tefachim The Gemara reconciles two shiurim: • Rov – the majority • Four tefachim. It depends on: • The original size of the oven. For a nine - tefach oven: • A majority is more than four tefachim • So four alone is insufficient. For a seven - tefach oven: • Four tefachim already constitutes a majority. Therefore: • The two measurements can work together. Back to Leather and Cloth A Small Remaining Piece The Gemara returns to the machlokes between: • Reish Lakish • Rebbe Yochanan. According to one version: Reish Lakish distinguishes between: • Cloth – a small remaining piece is insignificant • Leather – a comparable piece may still be chashuv. Rebbe Yochanan says: • There is no such distinction. A sufficiently small remnant: • Loses its status in either material. Leather Used for a Seat Rebbe Yochanan challenges Reish Lakish from: • A piece of leather that became tamei through Midras. If the owner decides to cut it for: • Straps or sandals It can lose: • Its Midras status. But if small leather pieces are still significant according to Reish Lakish: • Why should it become tahor? Answer The relevant size depends on: • What the leather is intended to be used for. A piece that may be useful for one purpose: • May be too small for a seat. Therefore: • It can lose its Midras status. Meat Attached to a Hide One Kezayis vs Two Half - Kezaysim The Gemara returns to: • Meat remaining attached to an animal's hide. There are two cases: 1. One complete kezayis of meat 2. Two separate half - kezaysim. If there is: • One complete kezayis Tumah can be transferred through: • A yad • Or a shomer. Two Half - Kezaysim If there are: • Two separate half - kezaysim Touching one half: • Does not mean he touched a full kezayis. But if he lifts: • The entire hide He has moved: • Both halves together. This creates a distinction between: • Maga – touching • Masa – carrying. Why Is a Toothpick Different? Imagine: • Two half - kezaysim of neveilah • Attached to a stick. If a person lifts the stick: • He carries both halves together • Giving him a full kezayis for Masa. But Rebbe Akiva says that two half - kezaysim on a hide can be different. Why? Because: • The hide can be mevatel the small pieces of meat. The stick: • Does not. Who Causes the Bittul? Human vs Animal Ulla discusses whether the scraps were left by: • A chayah tearing the hide • Or a person deliberately cutting it with a knife. A butcher leaving tiny scraps behind demonstrates: • That he considers them insignificant. The Gemara examines whether: • The bittul comes from the person's intention • Or from the hide itself. How Large Can the Meat Be? The question is asked: How much meat can remain on the hide and still: • Become batel? Could even: • A substantial piece of meat Lose its status because it is attached to the hide? A very strong reaction is given to the suggestion that: • Rebbe Yochanan held such a broad rule. Rav Nachman and Rebbe Yochanan Rav Nachman's Strong Reaction Ulla reported a teaching: • In the name of Rebbe Yochanan. When Rav Nachman heard the version implying: • Even a significant piece of meat could become batel He reacted very strongly: • Even if he had heard it directly from Rebbe Yochanan, he would not accept that version. The Gemara later clarifies: • What exactly Rebbe Yochanan's statement referred to. The Real Case – Two Half - Kezaysim The teaching is ultimately associated with: • Two separate half - kezaysim on the hide Rather than: • One substantial kezayis. That makes the bittul easier to understand: • Each individual piece is small • And can lose its significance to the hide. A Thin Strip of Meat A report from Eretz Yisrael appeared to say: • Even a full kezayis could become batel. The Gemara limits the case to: • A very thin strip of meat. Why? Although its total volume may reach: • A kezayis Because it is: • Spread extremely thinly over the hide It can still be viewed as: • Insignificant • And batel to the hide. Key Chazarah • Rav Bar Avuha teaches that simply starting to tear a tamei garment is not always enough; there is concern the person may not complete the required destruction. • Reish Lakish distinguishes leather from cloth: leather that remains connected can sometimes be treated as though its separated portions are still joined. • Rebbe Yochanan disagrees and does not give leather this special status. • Once hide is actually removed from an animal, it cannot “heal” back onto the flesh. • The skin remaining around an animal's neck raises a separate question of shomer rather than proving the leather dispute. • A tamei earthenware oven loses its Tumah when sufficiently broken and, where necessary, its outer coating is removed. • The outer coating can unify broken oven pieces, which is important according to Reish Lakish. • Different rules apply depending on whether an oven is cut horizontally or vertically and whether the remaining section is still usable. • The shiur of four tefachim and the requirement of a majority depend on the original size of the oven. • A small piece of leather can remain significant for one use while being too small for Midras as a seat. • With two half - kezaysim of neveilah, lifting both can create Tumah through Masa even though touching one alone is insufficient. • Small pieces of meat attached to a hide can become batel to the hide in a way that meat attached to an ordinary stick does not. • The Gemara clarifies a strongly disputed report in the name of Rebbe Yochanan: even a kezayis can be batel where it is spread as a very thin strip over the hide. Catch up, review, download previous Dafim & more: https://www.dafchazarah.co.uk Now available as an app (Apple, Google & Amazon): https://dafchazarah.co.uk/download Sponsor a day: https://dafchazarah.co.uk/sponsor לעילוי נשמת אמי מורתי רות בת הרב מנחם מנדל