Daf 120 — Chullin 120 Summary

Chullin 120 – Good Morning Raboisai Hair as a Shomer or Yad Review – Hair Attached to the Hide The Gemara begins by reviewing the previous Daf’s discussion of hair attached to an animal’s hide. Reish Lakish says: • Hair can be considered a shomer – a protector of the meat Rebbe Yochanan agrees that: • Even hair can function as a shomer. Shomer on Top of a Shomer? At first, hair seems to be: • Protecting the skin • While the skin protects the meat This would normally be: • A shomer on top of another shomer Which does not count. The Gemara explains: • The hair follicle penetrates through the skin towards the meat • Giving it a more direct connection to the food. Tiny Holes in Parchment If the hair follicle penetrates the skin: • Removing the hair should leave tiny holes The Gemara asks: How can such parchment be used for: • Writing holy texts? The writing must be: • Complete and uninterrupted. Answer Tiny holes are not a problem where: • The ink passes over them • And covers them completely. Perhaps the Hair Is a Yad The Gemara brings another possibility. Hair may function not as: • A shomer But as: • A yad – a handle. If a piece of meat is attached to hide: • Touching hair opposite the meat can transmit Tumah. But Can One Hair Hold It? One hair may not be strong enough to: • Lift the food The Gemara therefore explains: • We are discussing one hair among many hairs Together: • They can serve as a usable handle. The same principle applies to: • The hairs attached to wheat. רוטב – Gravy What Is “Rotev”? The Mishnah taught that rotev – gravy – combines with meat for Tumah of food. Rava initially explains rotev as: • Fat. Abaye objects: • Fat is itself food • So why describe it merely as something that combines with food? Conclusion The Gemara therefore explains rotev as: • Meat juices which have congealed These juices come from: • The moisture released by the meat They are not: • Actual pieces of meat or ordinary fat. Why Must the Juices Be Congealed? The Gemara asks: Why does it matter whether: • The meat juice has hardened? Shouldn't liquid meat juice also: • Count as food? The Gemara compares this with: • The laws of Yom Kippur. Eating and Drinking on Yom Kippur Liquid Can Combine on Yom Kippur Reish Lakish teaches: A small amount of liquid can combine with food: • To reach the amount prohibited on Yom Kippur. Why? The Torah describes Yom Kippur in terms of: • Inuy – affliction The issue is not simply whether something is technically: • Food or drink Rather: • Whether it provides satisfaction and reduces the person’s affliction. Therefore: • Even liquid can contribute towards the relevant amount. Tumah of Food Is Different The Gemara therefore rejects the comparison. For Yom Kippur: • The key issue is satisfaction For Tumah of food: • The substance must actually have the status of food. Therefore, meat juices count as food when: • They have congealed But not simply because: • Drinking them would provide satisfaction. קיפה – Kippa What Is Kippa? The Mishnah also says that: • Kippa combines with food for Tumah. Rava initially explains: • Small pieces of meat. Again, the Gemara asks: If they are pieces of meat: • They are themselves food. Rav Pappa Explains Kippa means: • Spices or seasoning residue associated with the food. These can: • Combine with the food for Tumah. Turning Solids into Liquids Congealed Blood The Gemara discusses: • Blood which has been congealed and eaten. Although blood normally: • Is a liquid By congealing it and eating it: • The person has demonstrated that he considers it food. Therefore: • It can be treated as eating blood. Principle By deliberately turning it into an edible solid: • He gives it significance as food. Liquefied Cheilev The Gemara discusses the opposite case: • Cheilev – forbidden fat – was melted into a liquid • And then consumed. One might argue: The Torah prohibited: • Eating cheilev But this person: • Drank it. The Torah Says “Nefesh” Reish Lakish derives from the word: • Nefesh That the prohibition includes: • Drinking as well as eating. Rashi explains the idea: • Both eating and drinking satisfy and restore a person. Therefore: • Liquefying the cheilev does not remove its prohibition. Liquefied Chametz Chametz on Pesach The same principle applies to: • Chametz. If chametz is liquefied: • Drinking it on Pesach remains prohibited • And can carry the normal severe liability. But Matzah Is Different If matzah is liquefied: • One does not fulfil the mitzvah of eating matzah with it. Why? The Torah requires: • Bread A liquid: • Is no longer considered bread. Important Distinction Regarding the prohibition of chametz: • “Nefesh” includes drinking Regarding the mitzvah of matzah: • The Torah specifically requires eating bread. Neveilah of a Bird Liquefied Neveilah The Gemara brings a third example: • Neveilah of a kosher bird This has a unique Tumah: • It makes a person tamei when swallowed. If the bird meat was: • Liquefied by fire And then consumed: • It can still convey Tumah. Again, this is derived from: • “Nefesh” Which includes: • Drinking. Liquefied by the Sun If the bird meat melted: • In the sun It does not convey this Tumah. Why? This is not because: • Drinking is excluded Rather: • The sun causes the meat to deteriorate and become repulsive. Therefore: • It loses its normal significance as food. Why Are All Three Sources Needed? Cheilev, Chametz and Bird Neveilah The Torah separately teaches the rule of drinking for: • Cheilev • Chametz • Bird neveilah The Gemara asks: Why are: • All three sources necessary? Why can't: • One be learned from another? Cheilev Has Unique Stringencies Cheilev cannot alone teach the others because: • It never had a period of being permitted • Eating it carries Kares. These special stringencies mean: • We cannot automatically extend its law elsewhere. Chametz Is Different Chametz also carries: • Kares But unlike cheilev: • It had a time when it was permitted Before Pesach: • The chametz itself was completely permitted. Therefore: • Its prohibition has a different character. Bird Neveilah Is Different Bird neveilah has its own unique stringency: • It conveys Tumah through being swallowed. Therefore: • Its law cannot automatically teach cheilev and chametz. Can Two Teach the Third? The Gemara then tries: • Combining two of the three cases • To derive the third. Each attempt fails because: • The third case has a feature not shared by the other two. Examples Chametz: • Had a time when it was permitted. Cheilev: • Has the severe punishment of Kares. Bird neveilah: • Has its unique Tumah. Therefore: • The Torah needs the separate teachings. Sheretz Juices Liquid from a Sheretz The Torah separately teaches that: • Liquid or juice coming from a sheretz • Retains the prohibition of the sheretz itself. The Gemara asks: Why is a separate pasuk necessary? Why not learn it from: • Cheilev • Chametz • Bird neveilah? A Sheretz Has a Smaller Shiur The Gemara answers: Without the special pasuk, we might have thought: • Sheretz liquid is forbidden • But only with the ordinary kezayis shiur learned from the other prohibitions. The Torah therefore gives: • A special teaching for sheretz. Why? A sheretz has a unique law: • Its Tumah can apply with an extremely small amount. Therefore: • Its laws cannot simply be derived from the other three cases. Other Torah Prohibitions What About Other Forbidden Foods? The Gemara now asks about other prohibitions, including: • Orlah • Mixed planting in a vineyard • Shemittah produce • Hekdesh How do we know: • Their liquids retain the status of the original forbidden food? Why Can't We Learn Them from the Previous Three? Cheilev, chametz and bird neveilah share an important feature: • Their prohibition occurs automatically. A person does not need to: • Designate them as forbidden. But Hekdesh is different: • A person creates its sanctity by declaring it Hekdesh. Therefore: • We need another source. Bikkurim Liquids from Bikkurim The Gemara turns to: • Bikkurim – first fruits brought to the Beis Hamikdash. The Torah says: • “You shall bring” This teaches that the law can include: • Liquid produced from the Bikkurim. Example If grapes were brought as Bikkurim and then: • Pressed into juice The juice can retain: • The status of Bikkurim. This shows that: • A liquid can retain the halachic identity of the original food. Why Not Learn Everything from Bikkurim? Bikkurim has special stringencies: • Kriya – the declaration recited when bringing them • Hanachah – placing them before the Mizbe’ach Therefore: • Bikkurim alone cannot teach all other cases. Terumah Learning Terumah from Bikkurim The Gemara next turns to: • Terumah. How do we know: • Liquid produced from Terumah • Retains the status of Terumah? The Torah refers to Bikkurim using terminology connected with: • Terumah. Therefore: • Terumah can be learned from Bikkurim. Terumah Has Its Own Stringencies Terumah itself is severe. A non - Kohen who intentionally eats it: • Is liable to death at the hands of Heaven. If he eats it accidentally: • He must repay what he ate • And add an additional fifth. Therefore: • Terumah alone cannot necessarily teach every other prohibition. Combining Sources Terumah Plus Another Source The Gemara therefore begins constructing: • A common - denominator derivation Using: • Terumah • Together with one of the earlier prohibitions The goal is to establish the general principle that: • Liquids produced from forbidden foods • Can retain the prohibition of the original food. The Gemara's analysis: • Continues onto the next Daf. Key Chazarah • Hair can function as a shomer because its follicle penetrates the skin, or as a yad when several hairs together can hold the food. • Tiny hair holes do not invalidate parchment when the ink passes over and covers them. • Rotev in the Mishnah refers to congealed meat juices, rather than ordinary fat. • Liquid meat juice does not automatically count as food for Tumah; Yom Kippur is different because its shiur is based on satisfaction and removing affliction. • Kippa refers to spices or seasoning residue which can combine with the food. • Congealed blood can be treated as food because the person deliberately gave it importance by making it edible in that form. • Liquefied cheilev remains prohibited because “nefesh” includes drinking as well as eating. • Liquefied chametz remains prohibited on Pesach, but liquefied matzah cannot fulfil the mitzvah because the Torah requires bread. • Liquefied bird neveilah can still convey its unique Tumah if melted by fire; if melted by the sun it becomes repulsive and loses that status. • Separate Torah sources are needed for cheilev, chametz and bird neveilah because each has its own unique stringency. • A special teaching is also required for the liquid of a sheretz because a sheretz has its own unusually small Tumah shiur. • The Gemara then asks how liquids from other prohibited foods retain their status and turns to Bikkurim and Terumah. • Bikkurim cannot teach everything because it has the special requirements of Kriya and Hanachah. • Terumah is learned from Bikkurim, but has its own stringencies of death at the hands of Heaven for intentional consumption and repayment plus a fifth when eaten accidentally. • The Daf concludes by beginning a common - denominator derivation using Terumah together with another source. Catch up, review, download previous Dafim & more: Daf Chazarah Now available as an app (Apple, Google & Amazon): Download the Daf Chazarah app Sponsor a day לעילוי נשמת אמי מורתי רות בת הרב מנחם מנדל