Daf 116 — Chullin 116 Summary

Chullin 116 – Good Morning Raboisai Finishing the Common - Denominator Derivation The Gemara finishes the discussion of deriving the prohibition of benefit from meat and milk through a common denominator involving: • Orlah • Chametz on Pesach • Mixed planting in a vineyard The Gemara explains an important general rule about how these derivations work. Strong and Weak Challenges When deriving one law directly from one other case: • A strong challenge is required to reject the comparison For example: • Orlah was never permitted from the time it came into existence This is a meaningful stringency that could explain why: • Orlah is forbidden for benefit • While meat and milk might not be. A minor difference, such as: • Orlah grows from the ground Is not strong enough by itself to reject such a direct derivation. Learning from Two Cases When the law is derived from: • A combination of two cases The derivation can be challenged more easily. Even a smaller distinction: • Can sometimes break the common denominator. For example, if both source cases: • Grow from the ground While meat and milk: • Do not That can be used to challenge the derivation. Why Introduce Mixed Planting in a Vineyard? The Gemara asks: After using: • Orlah • Chametz Why introduce a third source: • Mixed planting in a vineyard? Why not simply return to: • Orlah? Answer Adding a third case: • Strengthens the derivation When deriving one law from three different sources: • A minor distinction is no longer enough to reject it A much stronger objection: • Is required. Therefore, simply saying all three: • Grow from the ground Is not enough. An Outside Case Cannot Break the Derivation Another important rule: When challenging a common - denominator derivation: • The challenge must arise from the cases being used One cannot simply introduce: • An unrelated outside case And use that to destroy the entire comparison. The Gemara uses: • Neveilah As an example of such an outside case. Key Point These rules are important beyond this sugya because they explain: • How common - denominator derivations throughout Shas are constructed and challenged. Mixed Planting in a Vineyard Were the Seeds Ever Permitted? The Gemara discusses why mixed planting in a vineyard is considered something that: • Had a time when it was permitted The seeds themselves: • Were originally permitted When they are planted together in the forbidden manner: • They become forbidden. Therefore We look at: • The original seeds themselves They were: • Permitted before planting • And subsequently became forbidden This resembles meat and milk: • Meat is permitted • Milk is permitted • Their forbidden combination creates the prohibition. A Perforated Flowerpot Moved into a Vineyard Rav Shmaya bar Zeira discusses: • A perforated flowerpot containing growing plants • Which is moved into a vineyard Because the pot has a hole: • The plants draw nourishment from the ground They become forbidden only if: • They increase by one two - hundredth while in the vineyard. The Question This seems to show: • The original plant does not become forbidden Only: • The new growth becomes forbidden How can we say that the original seeds themselves become forbidden? Abaye – Two Different Cases Abaye explains that there are two pesukim indicating two different situations. If the seeds are: • Planted directly in the vineyard Then: • The seeds themselves become forbidden when they take root. But if: • An already - growing plant is brought into the vineyard Then: • Only the additional growth becomes forbidden And only when: • It increases by the required amount. Conclusion Therefore, mixed planting can indeed be described as: • Something originally permitted • Which later itself becomes forbidden. This completes the long discussion of the common - denominator derivations. Is Meat and Milk Forbidden for Benefit? Rebbe Shimon ben Yehudah – Benefit Is Permitted The Mishnah teaches that meat and milk is forbidden: • To eat • And to benefit from But Rebbe Shimon ben Yehudah says in the name of Rebbe Shimon: • It is forbidden to eat • But permitted for benefit. The Comparison to Treifah His source is a comparison using the word: • “Holy” The Torah uses “holy” regarding: • Meat and milk • Treifah Just as treifah: • Is forbidden to eat • But permitted for benefit So too, according to this opinion: • Meat and milk is forbidden to eat • But permitted for benefit. Which Meat Is Included? Rebbe Akiva – Three Exclusions Rebbe Akiva uses the three repetitions of the Torah’s prohibition against cooking a kid in its mother’s milk to exclude: • A wild kosher animal, such as a deer • A bird • A non - kosher animal These are not included in: • The Torah prohibition of meat and milk. Why Doesn't Rebbe Akiva Need the Other Derivations? Earlier, Shmuel used the repeated pesukim for other teachings, including: • Forbidden animal fat cooked with milk • A non - kosher animal • A fetus found inside its slaughtered mother The Gemara asks: • How can Rebbe Akiva use the same pesukim for his three exclusions? Answer Rebbe Akiva does not need some of Shmuel's derivations. Regarding forbidden fat: • Rebbe Akiva holds one prohibition can take effect upon another Therefore: • No special pasuk is needed to include it in meat and milk. Regarding a fetus: • Rebbe Akiva considers it ordinary meat for this purpose Therefore: • No special pasuk is required to include it. This leaves the extra pesukim available for: • Wild animals • Birds • Non - kosher animals. Rebbe Yose HaGelili A Different Source Rebbe Yose HaGelili derives the law from the Torah's placement of: • The prohibition of eating neveilah • Next to the prohibition of cooking meat and milk He understands: Anything subject to: • The prohibition of neveilah Is included in: • Meat and milk. Birds Birds are excluded because: • They do not have “mother's milk” Therefore: • Bird with milk is not included in the Torah prohibition. Rebbe Akiva vs Rebbe Yose HaGelili The practical difference between them concerns: • A wild kosher animal with milk Rebbe Akiva: • It is not a Torah prohibition Rebbe Yose HaGelili: • It is included in the Torah prohibition. Regarding birds, there is another important point: According to Rebbe Akiva: • Bird with milk is Rabbinically forbidden According to Rebbe Yose HaGelili: • It is completely permitted • Even Rabbinically. Chicken with Milk in Rebbe Yose HaGelili’s Town The Gemara tells that in the place of: • Rebbe Yose HaGelili People would eat: • Bird together with milk. A hunter was seen eating: • The head of a bird cooked in milk. Why? This followed Rebbe Yose HaGelili's opinion: • Birds have no mother's milk Therefore: • They are completely excluded from meat and milk. Rennet Rennet from a Non - Kosher Source The Mishnah discusses rennet: • Congealed milk found inside an animal's stomach The Mishnah discusses rennet associated with: • A non - Jew • A neveilah And the Gemara analyzes exactly: • What these cases mean. Using the Stomach to Make Cheese The actual stomach lining can be used: • To cause milk to become cheese If the stomach itself remains in the milk: • It can give meat flavor to the milk If it gives sufficient flavor: • The mixture becomes forbidden. Why Even Though It Is Cold? The stomach and milk may both be cold. However: • They remain together for a long period This creates the principle of: • Soaking is treated like cooking Therefore: • Flavor can transfer even without ordinary cooking. Rashi Retracts His Earlier View The transcript highlights an unusual Rashi. Rashi explains that he had previously understood: • The rennet in a particular way But then explicitly writes that: • He made a mistake • He retracts that interpretation completely Why Is This Significant? It is a striking example of: • A Rishon openly correcting his own earlier explanation And making clear: • That his previous view should not be relied upon. What Did the Animal Nurse From? Kosher Animal that Nursed from a Treifah The Mishnah discusses a kosher animal whose stomach contains milk that came from: • A treifah animal Its rennet is: • Forbidden. Why? Although the animal containing it is kosher: • The milk it drank came from a forbidden source. Treifah that Nursed from a Kosher Animal The reverse case: A treifah animal drank milk from: • A kosher animal The rennet found inside it is: • Permitted. Why? The milk gathered inside the stomach is treated as: • A separate substance It does not automatically become forbidden merely because: • It is now inside a treifah animal. Why Are We Concerned About a Non - Kosher Animal? The Gemara asks: Why should we suspect that a kosher animal: • Nursed from a non - kosher animal? Yet elsewhere: • Eggs may be purchased from a non - Jew Without assuming: • They were removed from a neveilah. Difference Treifah was considered: • Relatively uncommon Therefore: • We do not automatically suspect it. But non - kosher animals: • Are commonly present And a non - Jew: • Does not necessarily keep them separated. Therefore: • The concern is greater. Jews Are Careful to Separate Them The Gemara explains another distinction. Jews: • Keep kosher and non - kosher animals apart for these purposes Therefore: • There is less reason for concern. A non - Jew: • Has no reason to make such a separation Therefore: • The Rabbis had greater reason to be concerned. Shmuel – One Combined Case “Non - Jew and Neveilah” Is One Case Shmuel gives another explanation of the Mishnah. The words: • “Of a non - Jew” • “And of a neveilah” Do not describe: • Two separate cases Rather: • They describe one case Meaning: • Rennet from an animal belonging to a non - Jew which is a neveilah. What Is the Actual Concern with Non - Jewish Cheese? According to Shmuel: The rennet itself: • Is not considered neveilah The concern is when: • The actual stomach lining • Is used to curdle the cheese. Therefore The distinction is between: • The milk/rennet contained inside the stomach • The actual stomach tissue itself The actual stomach: • Can give forbidden flavor to the cheese. The rennet itself: • Is not automatically forbidden as neveilah. Rebbe Yehoshua Retracted The Gemara notes that Rebbe Yehoshua: • Originally treated the rennet itself as neveilah But later: • Retracted this view. Conclusion The rennet itself is therefore: • Not treated as neveilah merely because it was inside a neveilah The concern with non - Jewish cheese relates instead to: • The actual forbidden stomach tissue used in producing it. Key Chazarah • The Gemara finishes the rules governing common - denominator derivations: a direct derivation requires a strong challenge, while combinations of cases are treated differently. • Adding mixed planting in a vineyard as a third source strengthens the derivation; merely saying all three sources grow from the ground is insufficient to reject it. • Seeds planted directly in a vineyard can themselves become forbidden, while an already - growing plant brought into the vineyard becomes forbidden only through its additional growth. • Rebbe Shimon ben Yehudah permits benefit from meat and milk, comparing it to treifah, which is forbidden to eat but permitted for benefit. • Rebbe Akiva excludes wild animals, birds and non - kosher animals from the Torah prohibition of meat and milk. • Rebbe Yose HaGelili includes wild animals but completely permits bird with milk; in his town people actually ate poultry with dairy. • The Mishnah discusses rennet and the use of an animal's stomach lining to make cheese. • If the actual stomach gives flavor to the milk, it can prohibit the cheese; prolonged soaking can transfer flavor even without ordinary cooking. • The transcript highlights Rashi explicitly retracting an earlier interpretation. • Rennet in a kosher animal can be forbidden if the milk came from a treifah, while rennet inside a treifah can be permitted if it came from a kosher animal. • Shmuel explains that the rennet itself is not automatically neveilah; the concern with non - Jewish cheese is the actual forbidden stomach tissue used to curdle it. • Rebbe Yehoshua originally treated the rennet itself as neveilah but later retracted. Catch up, review, download previous Dafim & more: https://www.dafchazarah.co.uk Now available as an app (Apple, Google & Amazon): https://dafchazarah.co.uk/download Sponsor a day: https://dafchazarah.co.uk/sponsor לעילוי נשמת אמי מורתי רות בת הרב מנחם מנדל